
CFC Wedding Lists · Retail
A gift-list platform built around a 50-year-old business
0.78s
First contentful paint
Industries · Charities
By SimonMeasured 4 October 2026
The search data here splits in a way worth knowing about: the design terms are among the most contested on this site, and the SEO terms are not contested at all.
Pricing
from £500
for the build, then from £50 a month hosting & care.
The same three numbers in every sector. No setup fee, no minimum term.
What a website costsCybrial is a Manchester studio working with a small number of organisations at a time. There is no charity client on this site, so this page leads with the market and the method rather than borrowing proof from somewhere else.
A charity site serves two audiences who want opposite things. A donor wants to know where the money goes and to give in under a minute. A beneficiary wants to know whether they qualify and how to get help, often urgently and often on an old phone. Most charity sites are written for neither, because they are written for the trustees — history, structure, strategy, annual report — and the two people who matter both have to dig.
The donation route is usually the weakest thing on the site. It is commonly a link out to a third-party platform on a different domain, which breaks the visual thread at the exact moment trust matters most, and it frequently does not prompt for Gift Aid. For an eligible UK taxpayer Gift Aid adds 25% at no cost to the donor, so a donation page that does not ask for it is leaving a quarter of the money on the table on every gift.
And then the basics that establish legitimacy go missing. The registered charity number, who the trustees are, what proportion of income reaches the cause, and what actually changed last year. A charity is asking for money from strangers on the internet, which is the same thing a scam does — the difference has to be visible on the page, not in a PDF annual report nobody opens.
The transferable work is CFC Wedding Lists: a free gift-list service run by a family furniture retailer trading since 1972, where the journey is a persuasion problem rather than a checkout. Nobody has to use it, nothing is being bought, and the site has to be clear enough and trustworthy enough that somebody commits anyway. That is the same shape as a donation.
What this page cannot show is a charity case study. There is not one, and the honest version of that is a sentence rather than a stock photograph of volunteers.
The same three numbers as every other page on this site: from £500 for the build, from £50 a month for hosting and care, and growth blocks from £250 a month when you want the site to earn more. No setup fee, no management fee, no percentage of ad spend, no minimum term.
The nearest comparable work
A free wedding gift-list service run by a family furniture retailer trading since 1972. We built the list-creation, list-finding and gifting journey as a custom platform rather than bolting it onto a shop.
Straight answers
Not yet — there is no charity on the client list and this page says so. The nearest comparable work is CFC Wedding Lists, a free service where the journey is persuasion rather than purchase, which is the closest parallel to a donation that we have actually built.
The prices are the same ones published everywhere else on this site: from £500 for the build and £50 a month for hosting and care, with no setup fee and no minimum term. They are already low enough that a separate charity rate would be a gesture rather than a help.
The declaration and the prompt, yes, and it should be part of the donation flow rather than an afterthought — it is 25% more money at no cost to the donor. The claim itself goes through HMRC and your finance process; a website cannot do that part for you.
From £500 for the build and £50 a month for hosting and care. A site with a donation flow, a volunteer or beneficiary portal and several campaign areas is a bigger job and is quoted after a conversation.
Tell me what you sell and what the current site is not doing. You get a straight reply from Simon — what I would build, what it costs, and what I would do first.